Showing posts with label West Memphis 3. Show all posts
Showing posts with label West Memphis 3. Show all posts

Friday, November 07, 2008

The Burning Questions


Whether you supported John McCain, Ron Paul, or even Brian Moore, the real Socialist candidate, congratulations are certainly in order for the winner of the 2008 Presidential Election, Barack Obama, there are more than a few questions he needs to answer almost immediately. Sure, he can have a few days to bask in the glory of the acceptance of an entire nation-state, if not the entire world, but try to keep it short. Some of these questions may have already been answered in campaign promises, but as the last few presidential campaigns have demonstrated, promises can be forgotten so easily, and so these need to be asked. So without further avail, in no particular order, are the list of questions we here at the Fringe Element would like to see Barack Obama answer. 

  • Will you promise not to lie to the American people, even if the truth will hurt your political aspirations?
  • Will you move the U.S.A.'s foreign policy away from the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes into foreign countries?
  • Will you free the West Memphis Three and Mumia Abu-Jamal?
  • Do you plan to amend the FISA Act and discontinue the NSA's domestic surveillance programs?
  • Will you use neutral experts to evaluate science and policy before committing tax money to any specific plans and regulations?
  • Your running mate is famous for having been the reason for the creation of PGP encryption. Will you enunciate a series of principles governing your administration's relationship to the internet, and will you continue to support net neutrality? Furthermore, will you enforce net neutrality regulations with civil and criminal penalties?
  • Do you realize and acknowledge that infrastructure, the environment, the economy, taxes, energy, crime, prisons, and drugs are all interrelated facets of one national domestic problem that must be solved with a cohesive effort and a comprehensive policy?
  • How do you plan to address the ongoing global economic crisis? Do you want to convene a Bretton Woods II, or try to create a novel set of policies?
  • How will you direct your appointed Treasurer to manage the funds under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act? Will you direct these funds to help homeowners or businesses?
  • Will the focus of whatever economic plan you craft be to create jobs, like Franklin Delano Roosevelt with his New Deal, or to help corporations?
  • How do you plan to regulate big business? That is to say, how do you plan to regulate corporations so that no corporation is "too big to fail"?
  • How do you plan to encourage the creation and growth of small businesses while protecting the public interest?
  • Do you plan to trim down the budget of the Department of Defense? Or, if not, at least demand better accountability of funds that are spent?
  • How will you encourage private, self-interested companies to develop alternatives to fossil fuels and solutions for our energy crisis?
  • How do you plan to address the shortage in funds in the Social Security trust that were promised to the now-retiring baby boomer generation?
  • Do you plan to continue the War on Drugs?
  • To what extent, if any, are you going to restructure the military-industrial complex?
  • To what extent, if any, are you going to restructure the prison-industrial complex?
  • What measures do you plan to take in fostering a so-called green economy?
  • What is your plan for addressing America's crumbling infrastructure?
  • Do you plan on re-tasking the FBI from its current counter-terrorism mission to being more focused on domestic crime, such as white collar crime and political corruption?
  • Do you promise not to politicize the Justice Department and the various U.S. Attorneys?
  • What type of Judge will you appoint to the Supreme Court if given the chance?
  • How do you plan to address the Bush Administration's last minute changes to federal regulations governing such matters as consumer safety and the management of federal lands, and such bureaucracies as the Environmental Protection Agency?
  • Do you plan to drill for oil and natural gas offshore and in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge?
  • How do you plan to address the growing shortage of lending for college students and their families?
  • Do you have any plan to provide health care for all American citizens?
  • Are you going to follow-up on Vice President-elect Joe Biden's promise to prosecute former members of the Bush Administration for their various allegend misdemeanors and felonies?
  • Do you plan to continue to develop a new generation of nuclear weapons?
  • Would you be interested in negotiating a multilateral treaty governing Space, the Internet, and other facets of information warfare?
  • Will you continue to address terrorism as a national security issue, or view it as a problem of criminal justice?
  • Do you plan to rehabilitate ties with Russia?
  • Are you going to continue with the installation of the missile defense shield, especially in the Czeck Republic and Poland?
  • Do you plan to change America's foreign policy in regards to the Republic of Georgia?
  • Do you plan to change government policy as it relates to selling weapons to foreign nations?
  • What will be your administration's policy towards Israel? Are you going to take meaningful steps in creating a Palestinian state or otherwise realizing peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians?
  • Will you denounce Israeli settlements in the West Bank that have been recognized as illegal under international law?
  • You have already expressed a willingness to negotiate with the government of the Republic of Iran directly, but will you continue to enforce unilateral sanctions placed upon that country by the Bush Administration?
  • How long is your timeline for pulling American troops out of Iraq?
  • What is your plan for Afghanistan? Will you follow-up on your promise of deploying additional troops to the region? How will you address the concerns of the Afghani government about civilian casualties? 
  • You have also addressed a willingness to address the various problems in Pakistan, such as the Taliban haven along its shared border with Afghanistan, but will you direct the Department of Defense to continue using Predator drone missile strikes into Pakistani territory to kill militants? Will you continue to support the Pakistani government's campaign to fight the aforementioned militants in the form of cash payments and limited training, or will you try a different approach? Do you have any plan for addressing Pakistan's foreign exchange problem?
  • Do you plan to convene peace talks between Pakistan, India, and the People's Republic of China over the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir?
  • Do you have any plan to address the ongoing civil war in Sri Lanka?
  • Do you plan to engage in talks with the military government of Myanmar?
  • At the risk of asking too large of a question, what will be your administration's policy towards the People's Republic of China? Will you continue to sell armaments to Taiwan?
  • Do you have any plan to address the ongoing violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo?
  • How do you plan to address piracy in the Gulf of Aden based in Somalia?
  • Do you have any plan to engage in talks with Robert Mugabe's government and alleviate the humanitarian crisis in Zimbabwe?
  • Do you plan to continue the DEA's coca eradication program in South America?
  • Do you plan to lift the embargo on Cuba?
  • How do you plan to mend ties between the U.S.A. and Latin America?
  • Do you have any ideas for combating the rise in drug-related violence in Mexico?

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Free The West Memphis Three

Finally some real news. Judge William R. Wilson Jr., the judge who sent Echol's appeal back to Arkansas State court has recused himself. A second article provides some details of Jason Baldwin's appeal based on the argument that his lawyer represented him poorly during the original trial. The quoted text seems like Paul Ford, Baldwin's original defense lawyer, is cooperating in a genuine attempt to get an innocent man out of prison, and is doing so without hubris.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Free The West Memphis Three

Judge Burnett denied the request for a new trial for the WM3. He sided with the prosecution who argued that there being no DNA evidence at the crime scene did not prove the innocence of the convicted. Though if the Paradise Lost documentaries are to be believed there was no actual evidence connecting the three to the crime in the first place. If I understand the process correctly, the next step is to appeal to the Arkansas Supreme court and then to federal court. Unfortunately this could go on for some time.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Free The West Memphis Three


This article doesn't really offer anything new other than dates for the new hearings. I admire the press for holding interest even with the gag order which prevents the attorneys from speaking with the media. But I find my distaste for them increased by their repeating that the three were accused of being satanist. This is untrue and merely sensationalizes the story and promotes ignorance.

Friday, June 27, 2008

Free The West Memphis Three


The Arkansas Supreme Court denied the appeal to reopen the cases of the convicted. The court has refused to hear the newly arisen DNA evidence that indicates the convicted were not at the location commonly believed to be the scene of the crime, and no DNA from the convicted was found on the victims. This leaves open the previously denied federal appeal.


Thursday, April 17, 2008

Free the West Memphis Three: The Walk of Shame


This article describes the opening of the new trial. It is still hard for me to believe that someone could be convicted of murder in America based on the kind of music they listen to and the clothes they wear.

Friday, January 25, 2008

Free The West Memphis Three


Here is an article that vaguely describes a funds sharing agreement between the defendants. I just want to draw attention to the cost of justice in America. Toward the middle of the article the cost of the DNA testing that may exonerate them is listed at over $100,000. Thats just the cost of DNA testing without all the litigation and cost of incarcaration. The cost of keeping them in jail must be included because if they are aquitted then the state has wasted taxpayer money on the results of a sham trial on unreliable prosecution, and sloppy police work. The reason even the most selfish, cold-hearted person should care about truth in justice is the cost. If and when these men are found innocent they will be able to file a civil suit against the government that wrongfully imprisoned them for all these years. These cases always result in huge jury awards for the wronged person, and they should. The reason you should care that even the guilty get a strong defense is that money to compensate the exonerated takes away from your roads and schools.

Saturday, January 05, 2008

Free The West Memphis Three


This article from Fox News does a good job of explaining some aspects of the case, such as the circumstances of the murder and some of the new evidence. However, in some places it takes leave from the facts in order to paint a story that would be more appealing for a Fox News audience. I question the inclusion of the information that the victems were riding their bikes in their neighborhood before being murdered. Their bodies were found in a drainage ditch behind a truck stop it is unknown how long they laid there. You might as well say they were eating dinner with their family before being murdered if you are going to be including irrelevant information from an indeterminate time before the murder. This may all seem like nitpicking but it seems to me to be the author dressing up the story for his intended audience.
Another example of this is the erroneous statement that the police attributed the murder to the participation of the accused in a satanic cult. The prosecution never alleged that they were satanists, which would have been irrelevant even if it were true. One of the accused, Damien Echols, was a Wiccan at the time and the prosecution made much of this, finding damning quotes from some of the more eccentric mystics from previous centuries and by claiming that Mr.Echols held beliefs about cannibalism. Cannibalism, by the way, was not a part of the crime. The rest of the prosecution's evidence was that the boys were outcast, wore black, and listened to Metallica. As well as the forced confession of one of the accused who was mentally retarded.
"Thats some good police work there Lou."
The new information is that the federal judge is requiring the state courts to hear the new evidence first.

Monday, October 29, 2007

Free the West Memphis 3

New DNA evidence
http://blog.beliefnet.com/news/2007/10/evangelical-leaders-meet-with.php

The Website for the nonprofit org working to save the boys.
www.wm3.org